From the People Who Wear Serpeants on their Chest
For those who read my previous blogs on the drugging of our kids for profits, some more information as to the expert who tells you to take drugs and give some to your child. just 'following Doctor's Orders' takes on a whole new meaning when you consider the literature and 'expert' conclusions made concerning medicine in this country. Heree's something to consider next time he/she stands there in a white frock with aserpent on the chest, and tries to look down on you for questioning his 'orders'. Maybe you do have the right to consider his diagnosis as what it is, advice, and nothing more.
-Caveat Lector-
Revealed: how drug firms 'hoodwink' medical journals
Pharmaceutical giants hire ghostwriters to produce articles - then put
doctors'
names on them
Antony Barnett, public affairs editor
Sunday December 7, 2003
The Observer
Hundreds of articles in medical journals claiming to be written by
academics or
doctors have been penned by ghostwriters in the pay of drug companies,
an
Observer inquiry reveals.
The journals, bibles of the profession, have huge influence on which
drugs
doctors prescribe and the treatment hospitals provide. But The Observer
has
uncovered evidence that many articles written by so-called independent
academics may have been penned by writers working for agencies which
receive
huge sums from drug companies to plug their products.
Estimates suggest that almost half of all articles published in journals
are by
ghostwriters. While doctors who have put their names to the papers can
be paid
handsomely for 'lending' their reputations, the ghostwriters remain
hidden.
They, and the involvement of the pharmaceutical firms, are rarely
revealed.
These papers endorsing certain drugs are paraded in front of GPs as
independent
research to persuade them to prescribe the drugs.
In February the New England Journal of Medicine was forced to retract an
article published last year by doctors from Imperial College in London
and the
National Heart Institute on treating a type of heart problem. It emerged
that
several of the listed authors had little or nothing to do with the
research.
The deception was revealed only when German cardiologist Dr Hubert
Seggewiss,
one of the eight listed authors, called the editor of the journal to say
he had
never seen any version of the paper.
An article published last February in the Journal of Alimentary
Pharmacology ,
which specialises in stomach disorders, involved a medical writer
working for
drug giant AstraZeneca - a fact that was not revealed by the author.