by Doug Ireland
Published on January 3, 2004 By Wahkonta Anathema In Politics
Here's some breaking news as to Vice President Cheyney and Haliburton. Seems he may be indicted by France for corrupt business pratices with a nation second only to Bangladesh for criminal business associations. Hmmm, this guy is not going to be around for second term obviously. Who would YOU have as Vice-President?
ARTICLE BEGINS
-Caveat Lector- http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040112&s=ireland



Will the French Indict Cheney?
by Doug Ireland


et another sordid chapter in the murky annals of Halliburton might well lead to the indictment of Dick Cheney by a French court on charges of bribery, money-laundering and misuse of corporate assets.

At the heart of the matter is a $6 billion gas liquification factory built in Nigeria on behalf of oil mammoth Shell by Halliburton--the company Cheney headed before becoming Vice President--in partnership with a large French petroengineering company, Technip. Nigeria has been rated by the anticorruption watchdog Transparency International as the second-most corrupt country in the world, surpassed only by Bangladesh.

One of France's best-known investigating magistrates, Judge Renaud van Ruymbeke--who came to fame by unearthing major French campaign finance scandals in the 1990s that led to a raft of indictments--has been conducting a probe of the Nigeria deal since October. And, three days before Christmas, the Paris daily Le Figaro front-paged the news that Judge van Ruymbeke had notified the Justice Ministry that Cheney might be among those eventually indicted as a result of his investigation.

According to accounts in the French press, Judge van Ruymbeke believes that some or all of $180 million in so-called secret "retrocommissions" paid by Halliburton and Technip were, in fact, bribes given to Nigerian officials and others to grease the wheels for the refinery's construction. These reports say van Ruymbeke has fingered as the bagman in the operation a 55-year-old London lawyer, Jeffrey Tesler, who has worked for Halliburton for some thirty years. It was Tesler who was paid the $180 million as a "commercial consultant" through a Gibraltar-based front company he set up called TriStar. TriStar, in turn, got the money from a consortium set up for the Nigeria deal by Halliburton and Technip and registered in Madeira, the Portuguese offshore island where taxes don't apply. According to Agence France-Presse, a former top Technip official, Georges Krammer, has testified that the Madeira-based consortium was a "slush fund" controlled by Halliburton--through its subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root--and Technip. Krammer, who is cooperating with the investigation, also swore that Tesler was imposed as the intermediary by Halliburton over the objections of Technip.

Tesler is a curious fellow: A veteran operator in Nigeria, he was the financial adviser to the late dictator Gen. Sani Abacha and controlled his personal fortune, while at the same time working for Halliburton. Abacha's former Oil Minister, Dan Etete--who is suspected of having used some of the alleged bribe money to buy himself fancy apartments in Paris and a chateau in Normandy--was deposed by Judge van Ruymbeke in December. According to the Journal du Dimanche (a large Sunday paper), Etete's testimony seemed to confirm the judge's suspicions that Tesler laundered the $180 million through offshore and other accounts, and that part of the money wound up in dictator Abacha's coffers. Tesler's bank accounts in Monaco, Switzerland and elsewhere have been subpoenaed in an effort to find out where the money went.

Judge van Ruymbeke's authority for his transnational investigation comes from a law France passed in 2000 against "bribing foreign officials," following its ratification of a convention adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development prohibiting bribe-giving in the course of commercial transactions. The notion that the judge's targeting of Cheney might be in part retaliatory for the Bush Administration's exclusion of France from Iraq reconstruction contracts is unlikely: Van Ruymbeke is notoriously independent, and his previous investigations have been aimed at politicians and parties of both right and left. He's also no stranger to the unsavory world of oil-and-gas politics, having previously investigated bribe-giving by the French petrogiant Elf--indeed, it was in the course of his Elf investigation that van Ruymbeke stumbled upon the Nigerian deal.

The suspected bribe money was mostly ladled out between 1995 and 2000, when Cheney was Halliburton's CEO. The Journal du Dimanche reported on December 21 that "it is probable that some of the 'retrocommissions' found their way back to the United States" and asked, did this money go "to Halliburton's officials? To officials of the Republican Party?" These questions have so far gone unasked by America's media, which have completely ignored the explosive Le Figaro headline revealing the targeting of Cheney. It will be interesting to see if the US press looks seriously into this ticking time-bomb of a scandal before the November elections.


ARTICLE ENDS click link for copy verify
Comments
on Jan 03, 2004

1) No one cares what France thinks about anything.

2) France indicting anyone on corruption is laughable.

on Jan 05, 2004
what is not laughable is were slowly being wrenched out of our American way of life, That some of us served for, and some still are dying for.I think the French are only trying to slip in something for the debates to grab onto,Little do they know they are all in the same boat. And the press? where are they on this?Where is Orielly when you need him? At least he's trying.
The structured two party system only serves as a diversionary tactic and solves nothing I E. illegals.What part or illegal don't our great leaders understand?Unless the American people insist on a REAL third party,the game will go on;I'll blame this one on you and you can blame that one on me and the people will go, WOW!!
on Jan 05, 2004
BRAVO Charlie Poore. I hope you'll post more on this vein, as we need to rub it in America's face that the 'Republirats' are all the same and orchestrating their life savings away with this silly game anyone of average intelligence can see through. They live in denial, feeling betrayed but not wanting to lose face, so go on defending the clear betrayal. At last they run into, "But if you don't vote for me, He;ll win" as if it matters, but they go on believing they support the lesser of 2 evils. There's only one evil and it is republirat, either way we pull it. Hey, remember when that crazy wacko Ross Perot said we could balance the budget and end the dificit with a5 cent gas tax. Oh, that Crazy third party guy, glad they voted against him I bet.
on Jan 05, 2004
I find Republicans hilarious. Point out an unethical situation, back it up with facts, throw a judge into the mix (be he French or not) - all of it goes against your party's elite and the story is dismissed and ridiculed as:

A. French
B. Liberal
C. Terrorist or
D. Un-American

Wow, we've evolved as a society, haven't we? It must be comforting to simply dismiss facts based on the notion that all that aren't Republicans are simply trying to "destroy" our way of life.

HEY, who in the HELL let GWB on this forum, anyway?
on Jan 05, 2004
Well Michael Moore, let's face it, accusers should have some integrity before they go condemning others. Who in here would sympathize with Adolf Hitler if he went on national television and criticized Rush Limbaugh for being racist, besides the liberals?
on Jan 06, 2004
Some of the comments are "PartyLine" comments, as if the person is actually a shill. It doesn't matter to me if I'm getting such people to have to comment, for they are seen to histroy -this blog is archived for future use in research on various topics - for what they are, shallow-minded, one-sentence puppets for the Republirat Party line. Their comments are as sterile and un-informative as their politics. Yet, we've gotten off-topic here -another of their tactics to stop the train of thought such posts as this ceates. The topic is the Vice-President, Dick Cheyney, and his possible criminal indictment for criminal business activity with his former Company, Haliburton. He will not be Bush's running-mate this year due to this, his heart, and his involvement in the 'outing' of a CIA operative for political retaliation against her husband for exposing the scam of WMD to get America into Iraq. Cheyney is going to leave the ticket pure and simple. The ? is who would you replace him with?
on Jan 06, 2004
This is to see if I can alter fonts and size of by this . Please dis-regard in comment thread.
on Jan 08, 2004

I find Republicans hilarious. Point out an unethical situation, back it up with facts, throw a judge into the mix (be he French or not) - all of it goes against your party's elite and the story is dismissed and ridiculed as:

A. French
B. Liberal
C. Terrorist or
D. Un-American

I always find it amusing when people lack enough common sense to recognize that the source of information is often at least as important as the content.

Perhaps you could explain 1) Why Americans should care what the French think and 2) On what grounds they have to maek such a charge given their vast corruption on matters of selling military hardware to Iraq during the sanctions.

on Jan 23, 2004
For my reply to M. Wardell please go to my archive where I posted an article in response. all are clear to 1/22/04 at this point.