Excerpt of Rep. Ron Paul
Published on December 21, 2003 By Wahkonta Anathema In Politics

This is an excerpt of comments made by Representative Ron Paul concerning the Patriot II Act, which WILL be passed one way or another. Some speculate that as soon as the next 'terrorist' attack the board will go red and martial law imposed with the Act signed into law by Executive Order. The reason is several jurisdictions have declared the ACT I as void and un-constitutional in their Town, City, Borough and intend to challenge the first one, so there is little chance the second will pass Constitutional muster. I have tried my best to deny that such an event would occur in this Empire and avoided the 'extremist' and emotional representations that this Administration is fascist. Such labelling is counter-productive and neglects facts such as there is no draft in place, which would be necessary to effect a police State. Still, we are now as close to martial law as we ever have been, in my memory and so, it is worth a blog to keep people informed of such news the 'controlled-media' will not provide. feel free to comment or e-mail: wahkonta@graffiti.net. Blog On.
EXCERPT BEGINS
-Caveat Lector-
Bush Cabal Hides Patriot II Police State in HR2417

"The Clinton administration's paranoid and prurient interest in monitoring international e-mail is a wholly unhealthy precedent especially given this administration's track record on FBI files and IRS snooping. Every medium by which people communicate can be subject to exploitation by those with illegal or immoral intentions. Nevertheless, this is no reason to hand Big Brother the keys to unlock our e-mail diaries, open our ATM records or translate our international communications."

- JOHN ASHCROFT, as a U.S. senator, opposing the Clinton administration's request for broadened authority to eavesdrop on high-tech communications. From his Aug. 12, 1997 op-ed piece in the Washington Times, "Welcoming Big Brother."

"Fear the United States, for you will lose your liberty."

- General John Ashcroft speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee, December 6, 2001


Aftermath News Service

Citizens Resisting Tyranny, War, Crime and Corruption Update
___________________________________________________________________

Conspiracy Planet - Dec 19, 2003

Bush Cabal Hides Patriot II Police State in HR2417

Media Credit: Rick Kozak

by REP. RON PAUL

Mr. Speaker, I rise with great concerns over the Intelligence Authorization Conference Report. I do not agree that Members of Congress should vote in favor of an authorization that most know almost nothing about--including the most basic issue of the level of funding.

What most concerns me about this conference report, though, is something that should outrage every single American citizen. I am referring to the stealth addition of language drastically expanding FBI powers to secretly and without court order snoop into the business and financial transactions of American citizens. These expanded internal police powers will enable the FBI to demand transaction records from businesses, including auto dealers, travel agents, pawnbrokers and more, without the approval or knowledge of a judge or grand jury.

This was written into the bill at the 11th hour over the objections of mmbers of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which would normally have jurisdiction over the FBI.

The Judiciary Committee was frozen out of the process.

It appears we are witnessing a stealth enactment of the enormously unpopular "Patriot II" legislation that was first leaked several months ago. Perhaps the national outcry when a draft of the Patriot II act was leaked has led its supporters to enact it one piece at a time in secret. Whatever the case, this is outrageous and unacceptable. I urge each of my colleagues to join me in rejecting this bill and its incredibly dangerous expansion of Federal police powers.

I also have concerns about the rest of the bill. One of the few things we do know about this final version is that we are authorizing even more than the president has requested for the intelligence community. The intelligence budget seems to grow every year, but we must ask what we are getting for our money. It is notoriously difficult to assess the successes of our intelligence apparatus, and perhaps it is unfair that we only hear about its failures and shortcomings.

However, we cannot help but be concerned over several such failures in recent years. Despite the tens of billions we spend on these myriad intelligence agencies, it is impossible to ignore the failure of our federal intelligence community to detect and prevent the September 11 attacks. Additionally, it is becoming increasingly obvious that our intelligence community failed completely to accurately assess the nature of the raqi threat. These are by any measure grave failures, costing us incalculably in human lives and treasure.

Yet from what little we can know about this bill, the solution is to fund more of the same.

I would hope that we might begin coming up with new approaches to our intelligence needs, perhaps returning to an emphasis on the proven value of human intelligence and expanded linguistic capabilities for
our intelligence personnel.

I am also concerned that our scarce resources are again being squandered pursuing a failed drug war in Colombia, as this bill continues to fund our disastrous Colombia policy. Billions of dollars have been spent in Colombia to fight this drug war, yet more drugs than ever are being produced abroad and shipped into the United States-- ncluding a bumper crop of opium sent by our new allies in Afghanistan.

Evidence in South America suggests that any decrease in Colombian production of drugs for the US market has only resulted in increased production in neighboring countries. As I have stated repeatedly, the solution to the drug problem lies not in attacking the producers abroad or in creating a militarized police state to go after the consumers at home, but rather in taking a close look at our seemingly insatiable desire for these substances. Until that issue is addressed we will continue wasting billions of dollars in a losing battle.

In conclusion, I strongly urge my colleagues to join me in rejecting this dangerous and expensive bill.
EXCERPT ENDS


Comments
on Dec 22, 2003
That effect is already in operation and has been for several years. The government who fund the universities that created the internet and the main domain routers has been filtering every single packet. Raptor is one of those applications being used. The whole story came out a few years ago when someone blew the whistle on the government.