Conal Urquhart reports from Nablus
Published on February 1, 2004 By Wahkonta Anathema In Current Events
Some news not generally available to through the 'controlled-media'. good to know the type of allies America keeps today. Hmmm, I wonder if there might be a relation between, the terrorist attacks and hatred for America, and our alliance with Zionists who do such things as cited here. Feel free to comment or e-mail: wahkonta@grffiti.net Blog ON.
EXCERPT BEGINS
Conal Urquhart reports from Nablus on what the army says was an anti-terrorist operation, but witnesses describe as cold-blooded killing.

Sunday February 1, 2004
The Observer

The Israeli army is under growing pressure to explain a series of deaths of Palestinians in a three-week operation in the West Bank city of Nablus. According to witnesses and medical evidence, at least two of the 19 deaths during the operation have the hallmarks of executions.
The operation was launched on 16 December to track down Naif Sharekh, who the army say was behind the movement of suicide bombers from Nablus to Israel. The UN representative in the city described it as 'one of the largest military operations in Nablus since Operation Defensive Shield started in April 2002'.

By the time the army reduced its presence on 6 January, it had killed four gunmen and 15 unarmed civilians including six children.

One Israeli and one Palestinian human rights group are investigating the killings and want the army to launch its own inquiry, but it is reluctant.

Following the shooting of British student Tom Hurndall, 21, last year, it insisted that its soldiers had shot an armed terrorist. Six months later, following immense pressure from the Hurndall family, the army charged one of its soldiers with unlawful killing.

Ala Dawaya, 21, was on his way to work as a baker when he was shot by Israeli soldiers in the old town of Nablus on 18 December. An ambulance was called and driver Adnan Soso arrived to see the wounded man sitting upright and still alive a few metres from an army Jeep.

'I was called at around 3am to an area known as the onion market,' he said. 'I got there within about three minutes and saw an injured man lying against a wall within metres of an Israeli Jeep.'

He reversed to the end of the street, from where he could still see the injured man and the Jeep. 'Then they started shooting at the man from the Jeep. Every time they shot, the body moved and they waited then shot again, sometimes twice. They shot him about ten times over several minutes,' he said.

Eventually, the shooting stopped and the Jeep allowed the ambulance to approach. 'The man was dead and both his eyeballs were hanging out. I looked at what he had in the black plastic bag next to him. Trousers, shoes and an overall, covered in flour. We put him on a stretcher and got him into the ambulance.

'As we were about to pull away, the Jeep approached. The soldier said: 'Is he dead?' He then asked what was in the bag and I showed him. He asked for the dead man's identification card and spoke on the radio for a few minutes. He then told us to take the body away.'

The ambulance took the body to Rafidia Hospital where it was examined by Dr Samir Abu Zarour. Although not trained in post-mortems, he is the closest thing to an expert in Nablus, having examined 250 shooting victims in the past three years.

'He had been shot between eight and 10 times, including twice in the face and once in the testicles, and had a series of fragmentation wounds in his legs,' he said.

The army spokesman said that Nablus was under curfew at the time of the shooting in order to separate civilians from terrorists.

'Soldiers identified a terrorist planting an explosive device in the road. They shot him and when they examined the bag, it contained explosive material, as suspected. They later discovered he was a member of Islamic Jihad.' The spokesman denied soldiers had shot him several times.

On 7 January, as part of the same operation, a large number of troops entered the al Makhsia neighbourhood around 3am, surrounded the house of the Qassas family and ordered them to leave, according to Mofida Qassas. 'My father, my uncle and aunt and I had to leave, but they kept my four brothers inside. The last time I saw Abdul he was tying his shoelaces surrounded by Israeli soldiers,' she said.

Addul Qassas, 25, had returned to Nablus from Saudi Arabia two years ago after learning to make curtains at a relative's business. His three brothers were taken away by the Israelis. One remains in jail, but the others were released. The soldiers searched the house, spraying some rooms with bullets and a prolonged gun battle began outside. Witnesses were unable to say what was happening because they were keeping their heads down. Qassas was taken to the next door garden, where he was questioned. Nobody saw what happened to him.

Amra Sadija, a secretary at the Palestinian Ministry of Education, said: 'The shooting was continuous for hours. Between 5am and 6am, I heard a man screaming. He kept repeating: "I swear to God, I don't know who he is." His voice was so high I could not recognise who it was. I could not tell what happened to him because there was still shooting everywhere. Eventually, everything went silent. At about 6am, I heard movement and at 6.30am the soldiers moved out.'

Neighbours found the body of Qassas metres from his home. Again the body was taken to Rafidia Hospital and Dr Zarour. 'I was called at 6.45am and arrived at the hospital 7am. Abdul Qassas had been shot twice, once through the upper lip with the bullet leaving the body in the middle of the back,' he said.

The bullet's trajectory suggested the victim was kneeling when he was shot, said Zarour and the size of the wounds suggest it was fired from a range of between three and five metres.

The army spokesman said soldiers spotted Qassas hiding and feared he was a sniper: 'They began an arrest procedure, shouting at him in Arabic and Hebrew. They fired warning shots. Then, fearing he was about to shoot, they shot him. He was found to be unarmed, but the soldiers later found out he was a wanted man.'

His family do not know why Abdul was shot, but it is possible the troops suspected him of sheltering a man whose body was found in the same garden that morning. Ibrahim Atawi, 32, was a senior figure in the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in Nablus.

It is not clear whether he was involved in the gunbattle or how he died. Zarour said: 'His body was like a collander. I counted 15 bullet wounds of different calibres and there could have been more. Three bullets were fired directly at his nose. His right knee had been smashed to pieces. I think it was with a rock because the injuries looked as if there had been a grinding effect. Also his trousers were shredded around the knee and there were bits of grass on his skin and in his flesh.'

His left arm had been cut twice with a knife and there were what looked like dog bites on his arm and around his testicles. 'I do not have the expertise to say if the wounds were administered before or after he was shot,' he said.

The army spokesman said Atawi approached soldiers with a handgun. 'They fired before he could shoot them. The gun was later found to be loaded.' He denied Atawi had the injuries the doctor alleges.

The high number of deaths in Nablus over Christmas and their brutal nature have largely been ignored by human rights groups and the media because Nablus is isolated, but slowly people are beginning to pay attention.

Noam Hossfatter, a spokesman for B'tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said they were examining Qassas' death with a view to pressing the army to investigate: 'At the moment there is no eyewitness, so we cannot yet say there was an execution but if someone was in custody and was then found dead it would suggest something very unusual took place.'

Bassem Eid, director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, said his organisation's lawyer was expected to write to the Israeli military attorney-general asking him to investigate.

EXCERPT ENDS

Comments
on Mar 04, 2004
This article is actually highly inaccurate:

A simple question to ask yourself before beginning to read this post: If you have a valid case to make, do you need to use major lies?

Spend 5 minutes reading this, and check out some of the pro-Palestinian links, and I bet you will feel like you have been played for a total fool. This is propaganda at its very worst.


In the article it says that Israel killed 4 gunmen and 15 unarmed civilians including six children.... 19 deaths occurred during a 3 week operation between December 16th and January 6th, including two ‘executions’.

According to http://www.jmcc.org/banner/banner1/killed/killnov03-dec03.htm and http://www.jmcc.org/banner/banner1/killed/killjan-feb04.htm there were only 15 Palestinians who died.

Again, these statistics are supported by the Palestinian Human Rights Group. According to the following, 15 Palestinians from Nablus died between December 18th and January 11th. http://www.phrmg.org/aqsa/Dec.03_eng.htm , http://www.phrmg.org/aqsa/January_04Eng..htm

Were those who died 'unarmed civilians' or terrorists?

Indications of these men being part of Palestinian terror organizations

According to http://newstandardnews.net/content/?action=show_item&itemid=45

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) claimed responsibility for the bombing, which was the first of its kind in nearly three months. In a call to the Associated Press, the PFLP said the attack came in retaliation for the killing of two of its members some ten days ago.

Fadi Hanani, 25 and Jibril Awad, 24, were killed during an Israeli raid on Nablus’s Old City on December 18.

And at http://politics.surfwax.com/files/PFLP.html

Two of the militants belonged to the military branch of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and the third to the radical Islamic movement Hamas' armed wing, Palestinian sources said. The two PFLP gunmen were named as Fadi Hanini, 25 and Jibril Awaad, 27, and the Hamas militant as Majdi al-Bahsh, 24 (Arab Times, Middle East).

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article2374.shtml

As the Israeli army were beginning to pull out of the city on Tue Jan 6, they received information from a Palestinian collaborator that Ibrahim Atari, an Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade activist, was sheltering there.

So who exactly are the 15 unarmed civilians (including 6 children)?
Do they include 15-year-old ‘stone thrower’ Amjad al –Masri? Though the picture at the following website does not show Masri himself, it is evident that unarmed civilian is an inappropriate term to use for combatants armed with concrete blocks they are dropping on people. http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Throwing_Stones.asp

As for the other unarmed civilians:

http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Article%5El3154&enZone=Security&enVersion=0&

Four Palestinians were killed in Nablus on Saturday. Rawhi Shuman, 19, and Amer Arafat, 26, were killed by the IDF while preparing to hurl firebombs and shoot at soldiers, media sources reported.

And do the four other unclarifiable unarmed civilians include Iyad al-Masri, 17, who blew himself up? Is he one of the 15 unarmed civilian children?!

As for 'witnesses':

You state: “Conal Urquhart reports from Nablus on what the army says was an anti-terrorist operation, but witnesses describe as cold-blooded killing.”

And yet throughout the article you state: “Witnesses were unable to say what was happening because they were keeping their heads down. Qassas was taken to the next door garden, where he was questioned. Nobody saw what happened to him.” AND “Noam Hossfatter, a spokesman for B'tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said they were examining Qassas' death with a view to pressing the army to investigate: 'At the moment there is no eyewitness, so we cannot yet say there was an execution but if someone was in custody and was then found dead it would suggest something very unusual took place.'

So who are the witnesses referred to in the title describing this as cold blooded killing? Witnesses by definition have to experience something first hand.

A previous article in the observer talks about Qassis' brother actually witnessing the execution. If the new article has any truth in it, why isn't this real witness mentioned? And why do these 'witnesses' complain of different injuries.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1119104,00.html
on Mar 04, 2004
In the last year i´ve spoken to quite a few israelis, who were backpacking Australia as well.
They all had of course served in the IDF, ...and in the occupied territories.

Not a single one defended the occupation, not a single one had anything good to say about
the way the state israel and its testicles treat the palestininans.
They compared it to Auschwitz. And i am german, so you can imagine how that made me feel.

....does anyone remember the report where a IDF commando made a mass arrest, and for reasons of
praticability they started writing numbers on the forearms of their prisoners. ?

I know way more about jewish/german history than most people, and i find it disgusting that many israelis only learned form their history, not from our common history.
I´m not saying the palest. terrorists are doing good, i am only saying in their situation i would, too.

all orthodox jews and muslim fundamentalists are idiots, they negate the obvious reality we live in,
and they are willing to oppress so they can continue to live in their own world of stupidity and narrowmindedness.


This "problem" is so big, a few executed people more or less, on either side, don´t matter anymore. IMAO.

( i can´t believe i´ve been following this conflict all my life )





on Mar 05, 2004
'His body was like a collander. I counted 15 bullet wounds of different calibres and there could have been more. Three bullets were fired directly at his nose. His right knee had been smashed to pieces. I think it was with a rock because the injuries looked as if there had been a grinding effect. Also his trousers were shredded around the knee and there were bits of grass on his skin and in his flesh.'

This has gone on all my life as well. What it takes for a Israeli to reject his own Nations foreign policy is not slight. The whole civilized world knows the 'innacuracies', and can count them by the thousands. Some people are just 'my country right or wrong' no matter what they witness or know. In this case Israel is more 'wrong' than anything else.

Israel is a Nation which has successfully escaped accountability for even its possession of WMD for over 20 years, refusing to submit to inspection of its nuclear facilities, provide inventories, etc. They have prisons which are photographed but they say do not exist. It is very hard to 'prove' anything they do. Still, the body count does not lie. Everyday - and I mean EVERY day - the news tells the world of killed Moslems, who, without exception, are termed 'terrorists'. This makes us all say, "Oh, Okay" as if the death was justified and this was not a human being. The world knows what Israel is about and all the denial and obfuscation is worn too thin to defend anymore.

What is our option; to believe - as the 'controlled-media' would tell us - that in all these years no Israeli has violated a right of a Moslem, and ALL deaths are done in self-defense by a poor innocent victim of evil Moslems? It's as silly as it sounds.