By ANGELA GREGORY
Published on January 23, 2004 By Wahkonta Anathema In History
This is put up as it relates to my Scythian thesis. Previously someone (jon) replied to a blog on this I put up so i am posting this in forum as well. It links into my thesis very well, as I hold a link to Hittites in Scythia also. this thing has really come together in some significant areas since I first hypothesized it. Wow this is another big piece of the puzzle now in place.
EXCERPT BEGINS
Subject: NZ study cracks origin of English language

Modern researchers are finally coming to conclusions that Identity
Christians have always known. As it is, they only have half of the
story.
-hengist

Auckland University researchers have stunned academics worldwide
by tracing the origins of the English language to 'Turkish'
(geographical term only!) farmers.

Using a novel approach to develop an Indo-European language tree,
the researchers say they have evidence that the roots of the English
language go back about 9000 (sic) years to Turkey.
It was thought the language was spread either by rampaging Kurgan
horsemen who swept down into Europe and the Near East from the
steppes of Russia 6000 (sic) years ago, or by farmers from Anatolia
(modern Turkey) who had tilled their way westwards several
millenniums earlier. Professor Gray, an evolutionary biologist
in the university's psychology department, said yesterday that his
results showed only the latter theory could be correct.
Professor Gray said Hittite (an extinct Anatolian language)
was the first major language group to branch from the Indo-
European trunk. Over subsequent millenniums the same trunk
sprouted Tocharian, (located--eventually-- in Western China)
Armenian, Greek, Albanian, Iranian, Indic, Slavic, Baltic,
Germanic, French/Iberian, Italic and Celtic language groups.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The good professor needs to continue his studies. 'Tis not quite
that simple. The Celtic languages present a problem, especially
Welsh, which exhibits a very strong Hebrew character--modern
students of language attempt to brush this off as a 'Hamitic'
influence. (Even English for that matter has some 75 percent of
it's basic (Anglo-Saxon) vocabulary derived from Hebrew,
but the Welsh is a more startling example.)

Several other scholars have noted the extraordinary affinity between
Hebrew and the Welsh languages. Dr. Davies, in his 'Welsh Grammar'
tells us that almost every page of the Welsh translation of the Bible
is replete with Hebraisms, in the time, sense and spirit of the original.
Another authority, Dr Duncan M'Dougal, says: "You can take any
sentence in Hebrew and change it into Gaelic, word for word,
without altering the order of a single word or particle, and you will
have the correct Gaelic idiom in every case. You cannot do that with
any other language in Europe.

Rev. Eliezer Williams, (born 1754) Vicar of Lampeter, Britain, and a
Chaplin in Britain's Royal Navy, is noted as a researcher and prolific
writer on ancient Celtic tribes. He wrote the following: "Scarcely a
Hebrew root can be discovered that has not its corresponding
derivation in the ancient British language...In Richard's Welsh and
English Dictionary (pub. Bristol, 1750) and in several other philological
works, the affinity of the Welsh bears to the Hebrew language is
strenuously maintained. But not only do the words themselves
indicate that similarity between the two; their variations and
inflexions afford a much stronger proof of affinity."

Welsh scholars and writers of early days also noticed a remarkably
closer resemblance between the ancient British (Welsh) and the
Hebrew language. In some unaccountable way, these early studies
received little attention by modern scholars. We will examine a few
words to show how closely the Hebrew and Welsh languages
resemble each other, both in sound and sense, leaving no doubt
to the Eastern descent of the Celts. Many of the words, it will be
seen, have been transmitted into our modern English: (Taken from
'British History Traced from Egypt and Palestine -- Rev. L.G.A.
Roberts, Com. R.N., 1927)

WELSH ENGLISH HEBREW

Anafu To wound, to cut Anaf
Aeth He went, he is gone, Athah
hence death, he is
departed
Ami Plentiful, ample Hamale
Ydom The earth Adamah
Annos To drive Anas
Annog To incite Anac
Achles Succour Achales
Annyn An abyss Annan
Alaf Treasure Aluph
Awye Air, sky Auor
All Other, another Aul
Awydd Earnest desire Anuath
Afange The beaver Aphang
Bara Bread Barah
Bu It came to pass Bou
Botten Belly Betten
(or Potten)
Bedd The grave, our quasi Beth
our last bed
Brawd Brother Berith
(pl. Broder)
Breg Breaking Berek
Ber (or Ysber) A spear Beriach
Bwth Booth Buth
Brith Bright Barudh
Cesio To seek, to catch Kashah
Cas Hatred Cass
Catt A little bit Kat
Ceg The throat Chec
Cal lach A funeral feast, an old Celach
man doubled by age
Cell A cellar Cele (prison)
Colar A collar Kolar
Coron A crown Keren
Cwtta Curtail Kutain (tail)
Chroniel Chronicle Diecron
Chwyno To accuse, 'quoere Kun
whine?'
Cyhoeddi To publish Hodhiang
Cusannu To kiss Nashak
Dagr A dagger Daker
Dawn A gift Tanah
Dinas A town Medinah
Dafnu To drop, or distill Nataph
by drops
Diffygio To be tired Phug
Dalen A leaf Daltih (branch)
Darfod To finish Avod (perish)

But it is not in single isolated words that this resembpance
sttrikes us; the conformity is equally remarkable in the
idiomatic phrases of both languages, and in the formation
of entire sentences, ass can be seen. (Taken from 'Hanes
y Fydd.' Charles Edwards, a Welsh writer of the 16th
century, printed in 1675)

Note: the Welsh 'dd' can have the soft sound of 'th' in English 'breath'.

WELSH ENGLISH HEBREW

Gal hedd (Gen.31:47) Galeed, i.e the heap Galahedk
of testimony
Badad A troop cometh Bagad
Maer in addaw Maran-atha Marantha
Anudon Without God Aen adon
Yni all sydda I am almighty God Aniael saddai
Hyd Uwyn Mre Unto the plain of Moreh Had clouse Moreh
Yngan Jahacob waredd fi Jacob answered, I was Jangan Jahacob
afraid iarithi
Llai iachu yngwydd Let him not live before Loa iicheich engedd
achau ni (Gen. 31:32) our brethren acheineri
Ochoren balloddi hocdena? After I am waxed old Acherai belothi hedenah
shall I have pleasure?
Bebroch fo am beneuach When he fled from the face Beborerchvo impenei
ef dyfeth Deborah mam of his brother, but achieu; taniath Deborah
ianceth Ribecah Deborah, Rebeccah's em ienceth Ribecah
nurse, died
Yngan Job yscoli yscoli Job answered, O that my Jangan Iub ascol iascel
cynghaws i (Job 6:1,2) grief were thoroughly cangesi
weighed
Amelhau bytheu chwi a And then shall thy houses Amelau bathecha u bathei
bythau holl ufyddau chwi and the houses of all choi habhecha
thy servants
Angheni a gowan Thy terrors have cut me off Angini eu gouan
Iachadd ni Thou hast healed me Ichiiathni
Nesa awyr peneu chwi Lift thou up the light of Nesah auor panei-cha
thy countenance
Ysgoefon a gwirion Madness and blindness Isgoahvon u giwaeon
Gaenen oer fo Rain, etc. Gaenen Ourvo
An annos None did compel Aen aones
As chwimwth An angry man Aischemouth

We can only hope that Professor Gray will continue in his 'catch up'
efforts.

-hengist
PART2 BEGINS
NZ study cracks origin of English language
01.12.2003
By ANGELA GREGORY
Auckland University researchers have stunned academics worldwide by tracing the origins of the English language to Turkish (sic) farmers.
Using a novel approach to develop an Indo-European language tree, the researchers say they have evidence that the roots of the English language go back about 9000 years to Turkey.
Associate Professor Russell Gray and PhD student Quentin Atkinson published their research in the British journal Nature.
Their findings on the long-debated origins of the language have quickly spread.
The origin of the Indo-European language family has been the most intensively studied problem of historical linguistics, but numerous genetic studies have produced inconclusive results.
For almost two centuries linguists and archaeologists debated two theories on the origins of the language family, whose members ranged from Greek and Hindi to German and English.
It was thought the language was spread either by rampaging Kurgan horsemen who swept down into Europe and the Near East from the steppes of Russia 6000 years ago, or by farmers from Anatolia (modern Turkey) who had tilled their way westwards several millenniums earlier.
Professor Gray, an evolutionary biologist in the university's psychology department, said yesterday that his results showed only the latter theory could be correct.
He had used methods derived from evolutionary biology to study the problem for the past five years.
He accepted his approach to build an evolutionary tree of the Indo-European languages was controversial and subject to criticism.
But Professor Gray said he thought it was a valid technique that had clearly shown the origins of the English language went back further than had been thought, excluding the Kurgan horsemen theory.
It appeared that Indo-European languages had expanded with the spread of agriculture from Anatolia 7800 to 9800 years ago.
Professor Gray and Mr Atkinson had analysed thousands of words from 87 languages to find out when the various branches of the Indo-European family tree started diverging.
"We looked at words from different languages that were clearly related and grouped them in sets."
Professor Gray said a simple example was that five was cinq in French and cinque in Italian.
"We built matrices of all our information, gleaned from the internet and every obscure etymological dictionary we could find."
The researchers then used sophisticated computer programs to do the analysis and build language trees.
The length of the resulting branches and their various offshoots showed when each language diverged from its predecessors and developed a separate identity.
Professor Gray said Hittite (an extinct Anatolian language) was the first major language group to branch from the Indo-European trunk.
Over subsequent millenniums the same trunk sprouted Tocharian, Armenian, Greek, Albanian, Iranian, Indic, Slavic, Baltic, Germanic, French/Iberian, Italic and Celtic language groups.
A Marsden Fund grant from the Government and a James Cook Fellowship from the Royal Society of New Zealand helped to pay for the research, which included the equivalent of three solid years of computer time.
EXCERPTS END Feel free to comment or e-mail:wahkonta@graffiti.net Blog On.
Comments
on Mar 02, 2004
this article is the most boring thing ive ever read wat the hell is your problem who in their right mind wud spend their time writing a stupid loser articles that no one cares about go and get a life! thanx bye
on Mar 02, 2004
sam- Oh, there are plenty who care and read. Plenty who want to know. I thank the Wahkonta Anathemas out there.
on Mar 05, 2004
Sam: The article deals with some eclectic information as to the origin of civilization. Sorry if you are not into such. I have an ongoing study of this matter which has come to show substantial evidence in refutation of the 'fertile crescent' theory of origin, and this material is for use in that regard, more than blogging to the public. As I said in the beginning, there are some who do care and are not bored by such information as this truth emerges.
If I were to give you the whole thesis it would fairly well blow you away as you considered the implications. For now I thank you for the read and reply as you could have been off reading about Janet Jackson's chest.

Wise Fawn: Thanks for the reply. We aren't all on the same page, but as long as we get them reading it's and improvement.