More on Breaking Story
Published on December 20, 2003 By Wahkonta Anathema In Current Events
Since Gem City Joe and others have expressed interest in this subject I have put up a 4 part Reply in this Blog archive anyone can visit to get the complete timeline for the date of 9/11 as contained at http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/ . This is yet another article on the subject, complete with exaustive web link list for anyone who is interested in being informed on this. Because it is a story the 'controlled-media' won't tell you about, you'll find it here at this blog. Feel free to comment or e-mail:wahkonta@graffiti.net Blog On.
ARTICLE EXCERPT BEGINS
-Caveat Lector- Forwarded with Compliments of Government of the USA in Exile (GUSAE):
Free Americans Proclaiming Total Emancipation and Working Towards
Democracy. NOTE: In his splendid piece below John Kaminski forgets
the distinguished when listing relevant 9/11
websites. -- kl, pp



9/11 Cover-Up Falling Apart

Even Phony Kean Commission Concedes
Something Wrong with Official Story


By John Kaminski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


"If what I say is right, the whole U.S. government should end up behind
bars."
- Andreas von Buelow


To most Americans, the first inkling that something was wrong with the
official story of the 9/11 catastrophe occurred about a year after the
event, when President Bush resisted setting up a panel to investigate
the events of that dark day.

Why would he not want to investigate the greatest crime in American
history? many wondered. Then, he badly underfunded it. Then, he tried to
name infamous power broker Henry Kissinger to head it. Since then, Bush
has stonewalled a committee of his own choosing, one stacked with
political functionaries that is ill-equipped to conduct either a police
or forensic investigation - and, perhaps most revealing, one that
accepted the government's version of who the guilty parties were before
they examined any evidence!

To date, there has never been anything revealed to the public about
how the U.S. government KNOWS that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were the
actual perpetrators of 9/11.

Today, millions of Americans realize - simply from watching
thousands of cop shows on TV - that the one most interested in covering
up a crime is the one most likely to have committed it. Many more
millions also realize that the foremost beneficiaries of the attacks and
mass killings of 9/11 are the same people who are now waging wars that
are based on some very suspicious rationalizations, most of which since
have been exposed as outright lies.

Shockingly enough, even Thomas Kean, chairman of the committee
constructed to cover up this greatest crime in American history, blew
the whistle the other day that the attacks could have been prevented.
Whether this will develop into a real investigation, or whether Kean's
remarks were nothing more than what is called "a limited hangout,"
remains to be seen. But Kean's comment was evidence that a much larger
percentage of the American people is beginning to sense that the "they
hate our freedom" rationale uttered by the president is clearly bogus,
and there is much more than meets the media eye happening about 9/11.

To a far smaller number of Americans, the official 9/11 story began
to smell much earlier than when Bush tried to stall the official
investigation.

When top Bush administration officials immediately and in unison
denied knowing that jetliners could be used to attack American landmarks
right after 9/11, a number of alert reporters immediately pointed out
that this very subject had been under government study for almost a
decade. And when U.S. officials immediately released a list of the
alleged hijackers, the lie was immediately visible to those with eyes to
see: how could they deny knowing this possibility of a massive jetliner
attack existed, yet be able to name the alleged hijackers almost
instantly because these individuals had been under surveillance for
months?

If they could name the alleged hijackers, then they couldn't deny
knowing the possibility of using planes as weapons existed, could they?

As astonishing events unfolded after the tragedy - the hasty passage
of the Patriot Act (approved by Congress despite virtually no one in
Congress reading it before voting for it), which nullified large
portions of the U.S. Constitution; constant "terror alerts" about which
no evidence was ever produced; the war against Afghanistan which was
claimed to be a response to 9/11 yet was planned long before 9/11; and
the war against Iraq, which was waged because that nation supposedly
threatened America with weapons of mass destruction (which have never
and will never be found, unless planted) and had ties to that mystery
terror group called al-Qaeda (since proven to be lies) - many more
millions of Americans began to understand that the new peril they were
in was not from some shadowy worldwide terror group but from
unscrupulous demagogues in Washington who would invent any story - and
kill any number of people - in order to improve the fortunes of the very
military/industrial power brokers who illegally brought them to power in
the first place.

In the mind of these many more millions of Americans, a new
syllogism began to take shape: if they lied about why they went to war
in Afghanistan and they lied about why they went to war in Iraq, how
stupid would Americans have to be to believe what they said about 9/11?

And yet, through two years of intense flag waving, during which most
Americans were too terrified to say anything critical of those who were
ostensibly protecting us from this new wave of worldwide terror, the
lies became cast in stone. The media, owned by the same shameful
specimens who own the weapons-making companies, refused to even
entertain the notion that the U.S. government could tell blatant lies to
its own people, never mind murder thousands of them in one day.

Worse, what passed for the political opposition was afraid to even
whisper what was becoming obvious in the minds of so many Americans with
functioning brains - that the initial signs of a deliberate air defense
standdown, the phony mythology about Muslim hijackers, the funny way all
those buildings in New York happened to fall, the tiny hole in the
Pentagon that was supposedly caused by a giant airliner, and the
curiously comatose behavior of our president when the nation he was
supposed to be leading was under dire attack - that 9/11 bore a
multitude of evidential suggestions that it was an inside job, executed
to give right-wing crazies a better shot at looting the treasury of
their own country in a variety of ways. This scenario has now obviously
come to pass.

And that is really where we stand today. Shockingly, while millions
around the country and billions more around the world are certain that
this is what happened, not a single major politician now chirping about
irrelevant subjects in order to be permitted to run for the office of
president against the world's top mass murderer has uttered even a
single syllable that these millions of Americans who believe something
is very wrong with the official 9/11 story just might be right.

And in the so-called American free press, our prostituted media
continue a total blackout on the subject, as evidenced by the total
silence that accompanied the recent filing of a lawsuit by 9/11 widow
Ellen Mariani against President Bush for obstruction of justice and
treason.

This is a travesty of mind-boggling proportions. Like the entire
Congress that goosestepped late at night while it knocked over the U.S.
Constitution, here we have the complete political spectrum - every
single rich man who has declared his intention to run for president -
not daring to admit what millions of Americans know beyond doubt in the
sincerest depths of their hearts - that 9/11 was conceived, devised,
planned and carried out from the offices of power in the United States,
principally Washington, but also New York and Langley, Virginia, and
quite possibly Tel Aviv.

You have only to look at the psychologically palsied and putrescent
behavior of the official 9/11 investigative body, the Kean Commission -
as well as the insane and demonic actions of every single functionary in
the Bush Administration - to know in your heart that it's true.

And realize the jeopardy we are all in.

Fortunately, there are many scrupulous personalities who haven't
bought the shallow lies and who have worked doggedly since that dark day
to bring the cynical deceptions to light.

They have analyzed the fall of the WTC towers and concluded they
were most likely demolished. Why else would so much of the rubble have
turned to powder and the towers themselves exploded at the top? Why else
would WTC7 have fallen in the same manner of the others when it was not
hit by a plane?

They have talked the Pentagon scenario to death and concluded there
was no legitimate trace of jetliner rubble to be found, written that a
hole of that small type was most likely made by a missile, and concluded
that reports of identifying the DNA of every passenger on Flight 77 in
that rubble was simply an impossible lie if the fires were hot enough to
have melted virtually every trace of the crashed airliner.

They have concluded beyond doubt that the alleged maneuvers of the
Pentagon jet could never have been accomplished by someone who did not
do well in a small plane at a jerkwater flight school.

Many people have asked me, what are the best 9/11 sites? This is a
sampling of some of them. Study them. Hone your arguments. Talk to
people.

http://physics911.org/net/modules/
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#what_actually_happened
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/anti-war.htm)
http://serendipity.ptpi.net/wot/holmgren/11.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://wtc7.net
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc7>
http://nyc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=82574&group=webcast
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm
http://www.radiofreeamerica.tv/video/2003-12-12/911-group.swf
http://news.globalfreepress.com/
http://www.911-strike.com/
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=22004
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm
http://whatreallyhappened.com/blackmail.html
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=45885;title=APFN
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/bond-o05.shtml
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/dayof911.html
http://www.media-criticism.com/Baltimore_Sun_911_Letter_09_2003.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=44629&group=webcast

(Apologies to the many good ones excluded; I'm only one guy. These
are just a few of the ones I happened to have used.)

When you read through these and understand their contents, you will
understand beyond question that everything you hear from the mouths of
presidential candidates, government officials and TV commentators is a
lie. That there is so much evidence to convince you that 9/11 was an
inside job, that our leading officials are criminals and mass murderers,
that you, as a functioning human being on this earth, have no choice but
to try to convince your neighbor that something must be done if we are not
to go quietly into this police state prison that has been prepared for
us.

And yet, with all the comprehensive and inspired research that has
been done (really, the Kean commission only needs to read the internet
before recommending mass arrests for virtually all of the American
government's leadership) there are two glaring areas that continue to
delay the search for justice about 9/11.

The first involves the suspicious investments prior to 9/11, in
which millions of dollars were made by betting the price of certain
airline stocks (and other companies, some of which were located in the
WTC towers) would go down. Financial laws guarantee a degree of
confidentiality in these transactions, even though these laws principally
protect crooks with large amounts of money who are often doing something
the law does not permit. Nevertheless, the laws are set up to protect
these identities.

Had America a great and honest leader, he (or she) would suspend
these laws and name the beneficiaries of these suspicious transactions,
reasoning that the greater good was served by tracking down the real
perpetrators of the 9/11 mass murder instead of protecting the identities
of those who clearly knew that 9/11 was going to happen before it did
happen. Could there be any clearer path to uncovering the real criminals
who killed all those people in New York and Washington (and later in
Afghanistan and Iraq)? No, there couldn't. Any genuine investigation
into the crimes of 9/11 would start (and quite possibly finish) right
here.

In addition to releasing the contents of the black boxes that were
found in the wreckages of the three disaster venues of 9/11, as well as
the contents of the footage taken by the confiscated security cameras
near the Pentagon (which could clearly reveal what actually did hit the
Pentagon), the names of the investors who profited from insider trading
in the days prior to 9/11 would give us a clear look at who the actual
perpetrators of this unspeakable crime actually were.

It is a way to solve the crime, and it is clear. Logical people must
assume that those who would prevent this method of solving this crime
clearly have some involvement in it. This is beyond debate.

The second area most researchers have failed to make any real
headway in is the involvement of Israel and its intelligence agency the
Mossad in the planning and carrying out of the 9/11 attacks. Sure,
Israel was one of those many countries that gave advance warning to the
U.S. that something like this was about to happen (you remember, those
warnings that Bush and his thugs insist they never got, but fortunately
were reliably recorded by the other countries themselves).

The facts are that the evidence for Israeli involvement is
substantial. Two workers in an Israeli company located in New York got
advance warnings by e-mail two hours before the attacks. Israeli "art
students" were shadowing the alleged hijackers for many months during
their sojourns in flight schools around the United States. Five Israelis
were arrested for dancing in celebration shortly after the planes hit
the towers; two had connections to the Mossad. And, perhaps foremost, in
the city with the largest Jewish population in the entire world,
virtually no Israelis were killed in the 9/11 attacks.

Taken together, these coincidences are too astonishing to ignore.
And given Israel's history of "false flag" operations (conducting terror
and getting the blame shifted to another country), its involvement
throughout history in attacks on its own citizens and Jews around the
world to get them to behave in a certain way, its ponderous influence on
the American congress and the American media, and the words of former
Israeli prime minister Netanyahu, who immediately after the attacks said
they were a very good thing for Israel, many millions of people believe
that Israel was really the driving force behind 9/11, simply to get the
Americans to continue to do their bidding in the Middle East, which as
you can see by subsequent events, clearly is continuing to happen.

The withholding of information by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission of the names of the men who profited from the suspicious
trades in the days before 9/11, and the hidden role of Israeli
intelligence in a caper in the biggest Jewish city in the world in a
complex owned by Jewish businessmen continue to be the two most
significant uninvestigated aspects of 9/11, and the ones most likely to
lead to a genuine finding of fact about what really happened on this
tragic and significant day.

Unfortunately, the powers that be are doing everything they can to
impede investigation into these two areas, as well as into all other
areas of information about 9/11.

Thus, it stands to reason, just on the basis of rules established in
all those TV detective shows, that the powers that be are the ones who
committed these heinous crimes, for the purpose of regimenting society
more to their liking, because a regimented society is more profitable,
and those under the thumb of a totalitarian capitalist dictatorship, as
we are now, are far less likely to solve crimes and discover the
perpetrators of the horror of 9/11 that changed the fundamental nature
of the nation and the world in which we live.

It's not too much to demand honesty and accountability. Insist your
favorite presidential candidate tell you about what he knows about 9/11,
the insider trading, and Israel's influence. The answers you receive
will tell you exactly what kind of candidate you're supporting.

=======================================================================
John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a
collection of his Internet essays. For more information, see
http://www.johnkaminski.com/

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 17, 2004
http://www.ott.doe.gov/facts/archives/fotw246.shtml

US Oil Imports:

Top 10 countries as of 2002 according to the Department of Energy:

Canada - between 1800-2000 Barrels per day
Saudie Arabia - between 1400-1600 Barrel per day
Mexico - between 1400-1600 Barrels Per Day
Venezuela - 1400 Barrels Per Day
Nigeria - 600 Barrels Per Day
Iraq - Between 400-600 Barrels Per Day
UK - Between 400-600 Barrels Per Day
Norway - 400 Barrels Per Day
Angola - Between 200-400 Barrels Per Day
Algeria - Between 200-400 Barrels Per Day

What this is reflective of is the decreasing dependence on petroleum out of the Middle East, with the exception of Saudi Arabia, which continues to be one of the top importers.
on Jan 17, 2004
Let's get back on topic M. Danhouse70.
What you have put forth has nothing to do with the subject of the posting. As far as I can discern, your articles serve to foster dislike for the ancient American Citizens' ally, the French, who helped us defeat the oppresive British Governmental control of our Forefathers - who had to fight and die for freedom from the oppressive monarchial scam still ruling "loyal British Subjects' to this day - yet are now being villainized for opposing the thesis that there were weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to justify our invasion of Iraq. Since even Gen. Colin Powell, a loyal member of President Bush's Cabinet, admits it was false to represent such, I assume you too will not dispute at least this admitted fact. Besides rendering our presence and the killing of unarmed civilians of Iraq - who have never commited an act of aggression against the United States - a violation of law and our own code of morality, the evidence supports the French, and had we a leader as wise as the French leadership to see it was false intelligence, we would now have over 500 living best and brightest (this number is just since "official hostilities ceased")who are now dead from fighting on foreign soil for an unjust cause. But even this is not the subject.
The subject is that the 'cover story' that WMD were the reason we had to invade Iraq, and we had to kill Iraqis, ostensibly before Saddam put some bomb in a subway or other such plot, is falling apart under scrutiny, and further review. I go further and am willing to offer evidence of Who had prior knowledge of the 9/11 terrorist assault on the United States, and why is it not being told to the American people. The 'controlled-media' represent it was a spontaneous and surprise event and it was impossible to know it could occur. I, and other informed researchers, have asserted here and in other posts that the facts show there was United States Governmental foreknowledge not only years in advance, but right up to and during the very minutes it was occuring, and that the event was used as an excuse to invade Iraq . That this is in keeping with a report submitted to President George Bush as early as 2001( which held that there was money to be made by building a oil pipeline through Iraq) is more than coincidence. So let us go to the post page these next two days and view the FACTS and let the viewing Americans and other world-wide-web viewers see.
So as to not allow the topic to degenerate into a tiff, allow me to respond in the forum section - and in sections - as it requires additional space. Please then go to my future posts on who knew, when they knew, and why they did not stop the acts BEFORE they occured. I am distracted by such, but since you have difficulty due to lack of information, I think I should help you be informed of the facts. Let us then get down to it so you understand what the world's readers have known for months about this subject. For now, I must address other issues and information relevant to my blogging. I had a couple things to post un-related to this, so please excuse me for a moment as I tie down loose ends and then I'll be glad to put up a more complete reply to your posting. I do have an e-mail address of:wahkonta@graffiti.net if you'd like to take this off-line so I can answer your doubts more directly, but otherwise I'll post and note the posts as: "Reply to 'damouse70' Part 1, Part 2, etc. Fair enough?
Till then Monsieur,I bid you adieu.
on Jan 18, 2004
My goodness, so I post actual FACT, and you tell me it is anti-French? Certainly it deviates from your allegations against the US, however, it is fact. Spending just a bit of time researching UNSCOM documents, OPEC.COM, MBECKI, and many other sites that provide online research will reconfirm my post.

While the arguement that the war was for "oil" can not apply to the US, the arguement against another Iraqi invasion by France, Russia, and China based on the facts, suggests that it was in fact against a war in protection of oil interests.

My response to the allegations made against the US for going into Iraq were more than applicable to the debate.

It is clear that you and I will not agree on this issue. I am not an anti-government person, I am just anti-political. I also prefer proof when it comes to a conspiracy theory, allegations mean nothing to me, as they are made all the time in some format or another, and the frequency with which those allegations are actually recycled, discredits them.

2 Pages1 2